More self-analysis and logic alike.

4 days after the end of 2008, it is time to tell you more about myself. I have finally discovered that I have the following characteristics:
1) Hypersensitivity- Easily upset or disturbed
2) Paranoid- Abnormal Anxiety
3) Self-contained- Introvert
4) Self-denial- Denial of own desires
5) Uncertain

I do not know why do I have this or how did I get these. I fear anger and failure.

Oh! Logical Fallacies always hits alot of people. Emotions are misuse of logic.

I believe that I have been influenced with Argumentum ad Populum (Appeal to the people) because Peer pressure is the cause of it. I have been subjected by peer pressure because of the belief of uncertain consequences of each particular decision which makes the responsibility difficult.

According to the IEP (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy):

Human Thinking
Consequentialism seems to tell us to make all our decisions by thinking about overall consequences. But that way of thinking about life is, one might think, inhuman and immoral. When someone asks you a question, you should not stop to calculate the consequences before deciding whether to answer truthfully. If you decide by looking to the consequences, you are not really an honest person. Also, when you are about to follow through on a project you have started, you should not stop to calculate the overall consequences anew before you proceed. A sane person will decide on a project and then simply follow through, unless some new situation arises. Anyone who stops to calculate consequences before taking any step to fulfill a commitment is not a person of integrity. And what moves you to spend an hour with your friend or spouse or child should not be impartial calculations about the overall impact on the world at large. If you decide by looking to the overall consequences, you do not really love that person. Therefore consequentialism is an inhuman and immoral theory and must be wrong.

Does Consequentialism tell us that analysis of the cause does matter with the effect? Preparation can give the best results, so is preparation bad? (This is an example of a Non Sequitur)

Psychology and Philosophy are somewhat connected but contradicting.

Feelings can distort ethics because it is a certain manipulation of expression that focuses to a norm.

Unexpectation of things will poke the naked eye blind.

UNIVERSAL ASPECTS OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL COMPREHENSION

There are only 4 aspects in this universe we are eternally facing that makes everything complicated in terms of compilation of sides, similarities and conflicts:
1) Logical
2) Spiritual
3) Psychological
4) Physical

Logical - This is an aspect where everything is focused on morality, ethics, consequentialism, and other fields of philosophy that are without partial involvement of the Spiritual and the Psychological aspects.

Spiritual- This is an aspect where faith and belief comes in thus, partially ignoring the facts of logic. This involves astrology and the paranormal phenomena.

Psychological- This is an aspect where it deals with the mental health, feelings and emotions. It is accompanied by the Spiritual aspect.

Physical- This is an aspect where it deals the naturalization of materialism and its illusory essence.

For every statement there is a counter-statement which is the contradictory statement of the initial statement. No one is safe from conflict unless agreed and accepted as a fact.

Logicians, Spiritualists, Psychologists, Philosophers, mathematicians, politicians, sociologists, anthropologists, statisticians, educators, naturalists, entertainers, historians, lawyers, environmentalists and all kinds of Scientists MUST form a group for debate and discussion for the sake of humanity. Debate about all things. I would call this group as "Council for Global fate". This is a council far more effective than any other council, group, or organization in the world. I would imagine a group comprising of Jesus Christ, Albert Einstein, Socrates, Emmanuel Kant, Plato, Aristotle, Buddha, Stephen Hawkings, Isaac Newton, Democritus, George Washington, Martin Luther King, Abraham Lincoln, Steve Irwin, David Attenborough, Jose Rizal, Napoleon Bonaparte, Alexander the Great, and all the synonymous people. They symbolize the climax of human development and its relationship to the universe and to everything.

If this is a dream for all, I suggest that this MUST BE DONE.